Noemi Maines vs Camilla Zanolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Nov at 01:57 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Maines vs C. Zanolini

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Maines 1 - 0 Zanolini
They have played 2 sets in total, with Noemi Maines winning 2 and Camilla Zanolini winning 0. The last match between Noemi Maines and Camilla Zanolini was at the W50 Ortisei, 25-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Noemi Maines getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maines | 1 |
| Zanolini | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Ortisei(11-25-25)
N. Maines vs C. Zanolini H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.70% (58-36) | Career Total W/L | 62.69% (126-75) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Maines vs C. Zanolini Match Preview:
- In the recent six months, Noemi Maines outperformed Camilla Zanolini on second serve points, winning 38.43% compared to Zanolini’s 35.54%. Could this indicate Maines has a slight edge in her serve reliability?
- Analyzing return games, Maines has demonstrated superior ability, winning 55.16% of opponents' second serve points compared to Zanolini's 46.70%. Does this suggest she could exploit Zanolini's serve?
- For first serve returns, Maines again leads with a 37.84% win rate over Zanolini’s 32.78%. Will this give Maines an upper hand in breaking serves?
- Under pressure, Zanolini has saved slightly more breakpoints (49.51%) than Maines (48.54%). Could this resilience be crucial during key moments?
- Over the last year, Zanolini has a slightly higher match-winning percentage (61.22%) compared to Maines (59.02%). Will this consistency make a difference?
- Maines excels on indoor hard courts, with an 83% win rate, while Zanolini matches this success on hard surfaces. Could Maines’ specialty on indoor surfaces be decisive?
- In career play, Maines has struggled on clay with a 51% win rate, whereas Zanolini’s indoor hard court weakness results in a 40% win rate. Which player's versatility will be tested?
- Maines has primarily competed in Futures/ITF $10K events, achieving 60.98% success, whereas Zanolini has faced tougher competition in Challenger/ITF > $10K events, with a 54.55% winning rate. How does strength of competition affect performance perception?
- Facing higher-ranked competition, Maines' opponents average a 282.1 rank, surpassing Zanolini’s average opponent rank of 377.47. Does this suggest Maines faces tougher challenges?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Maines' 59% success rate in these situations is superior to Zanolini’s 44%. Does this indicate Maines better handles high-pressure conditions?
- Regarding break point conversion, both players are almost identical, with Maines at 43.90% and Zanolini at 44.09%. Could this parity predict a tight match?
Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):
Noemi Maines and Camilla Zanolini bring different strengths to this anticipated matchup, with both players featuring impressive stats across many areas. Maines' superior performance on second serves and return games highlights her offensive prowess, suggesting she may capitalize on more opportunities to break Zanolini's serve.
However, Zanolini's ability to play under pressure and resilience at higher-stakes levels cannot be underestimated, slightly edging Maines in breakpoint saves and offering a consistent match-winning record. Moreover, Zanolini's familiarity with tougher competition at higher-level tournaments may provide her with a decided mental advantage when handling close exchanges.
Both players show equivalent abilities in converting breakpoints, forecasting an evenly matched contest. However, Noemi Maines’ stronger current form in deciding sets and her specific success on indoor hard courts could tilt the balance in her favor.
Based on the statistical analysis and recent trends, Noemi Maines is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match, leveraging her strategic return game and consistent performance in decisive moments.
Noemi Maines vs Camilla Zanolini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Maines vs C. Zanolini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:52:2 | Average Match Time | 1:52:2 |
| 59% (44/74) | 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) |
| 70% (31/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (31/51) |
| 50% (15/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 45% (35/78) | Return Points Win % | 38% (28/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Maines Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
C. Zanolini Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

N. Maines vs C. Zanolini Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.70% (58/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.69% (126/75) |
| 59.15% (126/87) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.40% (280/176) |
| 53.62% (1052/910) | Games Win/Loss | 55.66% (2298/1831) |
| 65.91% (29/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.58% (62/34) |
| 51.43% (18/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.45% (51/32) |
| 73.33% (11/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 100 | Aces Total | 104 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 311 | Total Double Faults | 470 |
| 1:19:56 | Average Match Time | 1:12:46 |
| 298.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.19 |
| 62% (3006/4878) | 1st Serve % | 70% (6960/9898) |
| 60% (1805/3006) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4074/6960) |
| 43% (813/1872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1299/2938) |
| 49% (311/634) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (736/1439) |
| 47% (2280/4841) | Return Points Win % | 50% (5075/10220) |
| 54.17% (13/11) | Challenger W/L | 53.57% (30/26) |
| 64.29% (45/25) | Futures W/L | 66.21% (96/49) |
| 62% (58/94) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (124/198) |
| 71% (10/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (16/31) |
| 60% (15/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (27/57) |
| 88% (58/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (124/109) |
| 12% (58/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (124/15) |
| 19% (36/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (77/17) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
